[DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

Fri Aug 20 11:23:47 EDT 2021

Flavio,

I assume I did something wrong while the manual work not with the programmatic step. As long as you don’t notice some systematic changes I don’t provide a new version.
Is this fine with you?

Achim

From: Flavio Rizzolo <flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com>
Sent: Freitag, 20. August 2021 17:20
To: Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; Hoyle, Larry <larryhoyle at ku.edu>; DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

Ok, that looks like the version we discussed on Wednesday. I'm not that crazy then, which is good :-)

Achim: will you try to figure out what happened and provide a new version? If it is just this class I can fix it by hand, but it this happened here there might be more problems...

Please let me know what you want me to do.

Thanks,

Flavio

On 2021-08-20 10:58 a.m., Wackerow, Joachim wrote:
Most of the Reference attribute types seem to be wrong. I don’t know why. It looks like I screwed something up, sorry.

It should look like below.

Achim

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D795E8.21638300]

From: Flavio Rizzolo <flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com><mailto:flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com>
Sent: Freitag, 20. August 2021 16:51
To: Hoyle, Larry <larryhoyle at ku.edu><mailto:larryhoyle at ku.edu>; Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org><mailto:Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu><mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

BTW, what happened to the InternationalRegistrationDataIdentifier? The ddiReference used to be of that type.

Don't we need it anymore?

Flavio

On 2021-08-20 10:48 a.m., Flavio Rizzolo wrote:

Then I don't understand how the latest Reference works.

In any case, I don't need to understand it, I just need the NativeReference, which will then be :

[cid:image002.png at 01D795E8.21638300]

At some point we need to document how the new Reference works without any ControlledVocabularyEntry.

Flavio

On 2021-08-20 10:15 a.m., Hoyle, Larry wrote:
There is an entryValue that is the string. I think the entryReference should be  a Reference to the entry in a vocabulary, in case there is supplemental material vis a vis the value.

I thought there would be a vocabulary Reference  (here named “vocabulary”) to the vocabulary as a whole, which could also lead people to the supplemental material about the vocabulary.

I think in our discussion we changed the “semantic” property in Reference from a ControlledVocabularyEntry to a String to avoid a circular set of uses, leading to possibly infinite depth. The way Reference is modeled in the latest xmi reflects that.

Larry

From: ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu<mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu><mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> On Behalf Of Flavio Rizzolo
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 8:33 AM
To: Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org><mailto:Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu><mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

At least in the latest discussion on Wednesday we talked about the version with Reference, when we agreed there should be a new NativeControlledVocabularyEntry that uses the new NativeReference. Everybody seemed to think Reference was supposed to be there...

Flavio

On 2021-08-20 9:29 a.m., Wackerow, Joachim wrote:
Hi Flavio,

Both, entryReference and vocabulary, were typed as Reference in the previous version. At least in the SKOS case, it would make sense.

Sorry, I don’t recall why both are now typed as String. Did I this by intent after a decision in the CDI meeting or did I this by accident?

Does anybody remember the discussion?

Achim

From: ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu<mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu><mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> On Behalf Of Flavio Rizzolo
Sent: Freitag, 20. August 2021 03:04
To: DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu><mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
Subject: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

Hi,

I'm working with the latest xmi, DDI-CDI_2021-08-13.xmi, and I noticed that ControlledVocabularyEntry has changed since the last version.

It used to be

[cid:image003.png at 01D795E8.21638300]

And now it is

[cid:image004.png at 01D795E8.21638300]

As you can see, entryReference is now of type String and before it used to be of type Reference. Which one is correct?

Thanks,

Flavio

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/728cf459/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 38156 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/728cf459/attachment-0001.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 85401 bytes
Desc: image002.png
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/728cf459/attachment-0003.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 72407 bytes
Desc: image003.png
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/728cf459/attachment-0004.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 71755 bytes
Desc: image004.png
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/728cf459/attachment-0005.png 