[DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

Flavio Rizzolo flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com
Fri Aug 20 11:29:58 EDT 2021


Yes.

I assume the problems are all here:

Flavio


On 2021-08-20 11:23 a.m., Wackerow, Joachim wrote:
>
> Flavio,
>
> I assume I did something wrong while the manual work not with the 
> programmatic step. As long as you don’t notice some systematic changes 
> I don’t provide a new version.
>
> Is this fine with you?
>
> Achim
>
> *From:*Flavio Rizzolo <flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Freitag, 20. August 2021 17:20
> *To:* Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; Hoyle, Larry 
> <larryhoyle at ku.edu>; DDI Structural Reform Working Group. 
> <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
> *Subject:* Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry
>
> Ok, that looks like the version we discussed on Wednesday. I'm not 
> that crazy then, which is good :-)
>
> Achim: will you try to figure out what happened and provide a new 
> version? If it is just this class I can fix it by hand, but it this 
> happened here there might be more problems...
>
> Please let me know what you want me to do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Flavio
>
> On 2021-08-20 10:58 a.m., Wackerow, Joachim wrote:
>
>     Most of the Reference attribute types seem to be wrong. I don’t
>     know why. It looks like I screwed something up, sorry.
>
>     It should look like below.
>
>     Achim
>
>     *From:*Flavio Rizzolo <flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:flavio.rizzolo at gmail.com>
>     *Sent:* Freitag, 20. August 2021 16:51
>     *To:* Hoyle, Larry <larryhoyle at ku.edu> <mailto:larryhoyle at ku.edu>;
>     Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>
>     <mailto:Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; DDI Structural Reform Working
>     Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu> <mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
>     *Subject:* Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry
>
>     BTW, what happened to the InternationalRegistrationDataIdentifier?
>     The ddiReference used to be of that type.
>
>     Don't we need it anymore?
>
>     Flavio
>
>     On 2021-08-20 10:48 a.m., Flavio Rizzolo wrote:
>
>         Then I don't understand how the latest Reference works.
>
>         In any case, I don't need to understand it, I just need the
>         NativeReference, which will then be :
>
>         At some point we need to document how the new Reference works
>         without any ControlledVocabularyEntry.
>
>         Flavio
>
>         On 2021-08-20 10:15 a.m., Hoyle, Larry wrote:
>
>             There is an entryValue that is the string. I think the
>             entryReference should be  a Reference to the entry in a
>             vocabulary, in case there is supplemental material vis a
>             vis the value.
>
>             I thought there would be a vocabulary Reference  (here
>             named “vocabulary”) to the vocabulary as a whole, which
>             could also lead people to the supplemental material about
>             the vocabulary.
>
>             I think in our discussion we changed the “semantic”
>             property in Reference from a ControlledVocabularyEntry to
>             a String to avoid a circular set of uses, leading to
>             possibly infinite depth. The way Reference is modeled in
>             the latest xmi reflects that.
>
>             Larry
>
>             *From:* ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu
>             <mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu>
>             <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu>
>             <mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> *On Behalf Of
>             *Flavio Rizzolo
>             *Sent:* Friday, August 20, 2021 8:33 AM
>             *To:* Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>
>             <mailto:Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; DDI Structural Reform
>             Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
>             <mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
>             *Subject:* Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry
>
>             At least in the latest discussion on Wednesday we talked
>             about the version with Reference, when we agreed there
>             should be a new NativeControlledVocabularyEntry that uses
>             the new NativeReference. Everybody seemed to think
>             Reference was supposed to be there...
>
>             Flavio
>
>             On 2021-08-20 9:29 a.m., Wackerow, Joachim wrote:
>
>                 Hi Flavio,
>
>                 Both, entryReference and vocabulary, were typed as
>                 Reference in the previous version. At least in the
>                 SKOS case, it would make sense.
>
>                 Sorry, I don’t recall why both are now typed as
>                 String. Did I this by intent after a decision in the
>                 CDI meeting or did I this by accident?
>
>                 Does anybody remember the discussion?
>
>                 Achim
>
>                 *From:* ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu
>                 <mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu>
>                 <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu>
>                 <mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> *On Behalf Of
>                 *Flavio Rizzolo
>                 *Sent:* Freitag, 20. August 2021 03:04
>                 *To:* DDI Structural Reform Working Group.
>                 <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu> <mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
>                 *Subject:* [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry
>
>                 Hi,
>
>                 I'm working with the latest xmi,
>                 DDI-CDI_2021-08-13.xmi, and I noticed that
>                 ControlledVocabularyEntry has changed since the last
>                 version.
>
>                 It used to be
>
>                 And now it is
>
>                 As you can see, entryReference is now of type String
>                 and before it used to be of type Reference. Which one
>                 is correct?
>
>                 Thanks,
>
>                 Flavio
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/420bc3e1/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: odoemmidofijnfem.png
Type: image/png
Size: 63517 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/420bc3e1/attachment-0004.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 38156 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/420bc3e1/attachment-0001.jpg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 85401 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/420bc3e1/attachment-0005.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 72407 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/420bc3e1/attachment-0006.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 71755 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/420bc3e1/attachment-0007.png 


More information about the DDI-SRG mailing list