[DDI-SRG] [CDI] Cleaned up Process Model with new InternalReference

[Hoyle, Larry]

Some quick reactions

Having a separate InternalReference makes sense.   Using it from Activity makes this much more general and “future proof” than having to explicitly describe inheritances from InformationObject.The documentation should make clear that “internal” means an entity from the DDI  standard, not just some instance in a bundle.
There is a note about CommandCode, etc “What do we do about all these”. They are referenced in Activity by the script property. That makes sense.

Several classes have an identifier but no other content. Is they to be fleshed out later?

The datatype “EA_Java_Tyoes_Package” still appears

Thanks Flavio

From: ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> On Behalf Of Flavio Rizzolo
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 1:58 AM
To: DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
Subject: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] Cleaned up Process Model with new InternalReference


Hi all,

Here is a diagram of the simplified Process Model:



[cid:image001.png at 01D7940E.ABF14DD0]



I think this addresses Larry's concerns, and it seems to me a better solution than the bridge since it uses a simpler reference instead of an entirely new approach.

We'll discuss later.

Cheers,

Flavio


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210818/e752a3bb/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1275923 bytes
Desc: image001.png
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210818/e752a3bb/attachment-0001.png