[DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry

[Flavio Rizzolo]

Then I don't understand how the latest Reference works.

In any case, I don't need to understand it, I just need the 
NativeReference, which will then be :

At some point we need to document how the new Reference works without 
any ControlledVocabularyEntry.

Flavio


On 2021-08-20 10:15 a.m., Hoyle, Larry wrote:
>
> There is an entryValue that is the string. I think the entryReference 
> should be  a Reference to the entry in a vocabulary, in case there is 
> supplemental material vis a vis the value.
>
> I thought there would be a vocabulary Reference  (here named 
> “vocabulary”) to the vocabulary as a whole, which could also lead 
> people to the supplemental material about the vocabulary.
>
> I think in our discussion we changed the “semantic” property in 
> Reference from a ControlledVocabularyEntry to a String to avoid a 
> circular set of uses, leading to possibly infinite depth. The way 
> Reference is modeled in the latest xmi reflects that.
>
> Larry
>
> *From:* ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu 
> <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> *On Behalf Of *Flavio Rizzolo
> *Sent:* Friday, August 20, 2021 8:33 AM
> *To:* Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; DDI Structural 
> Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
> *Subject:* Re: [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry
>
> At least in the latest discussion on Wednesday we talked about the 
> version with Reference, when we agreed there should be a new 
> NativeControlledVocabularyEntry that uses the new NativeReference. 
> Everybody seemed to think Reference was supposed to be there...
>
> Flavio
>
> On 2021-08-20 9:29 a.m., Wackerow, Joachim wrote:
>
>     Hi Flavio,
>
>     Both, entryReference and vocabulary, were typed as Reference in
>     the previous version. At least in the SKOS case, it would make sense.
>
>     Sorry, I don’t recall why both are now typed as String. Did I this
>     by intent after a decision in the CDI meeting or did I this by
>     accident?
>
>     Does anybody remember the discussion?
>
>     Achim
>
>     *From:* ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu
>     <mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu>
>     <ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu>
>     <mailto:ddi-srg-bounces at icpsr.umich.edu> *On Behalf Of *Flavio Rizzolo
>     *Sent:* Freitag, 20. August 2021 03:04
>     *To:* DDI Structural Reform Working Group.
>     <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu> <mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
>     *Subject:* [DDI-SRG] [CDI] ControlledVocabularyEntry
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I'm working with the latest xmi, DDI-CDI_2021-08-13.xmi, and I
>     noticed that ControlledVocabularyEntry has changed since the last
>     version.
>
>     It used to be
>
>     And now it is
>
>     As you can see, entryReference is now of type String and before it
>     used to be of type Reference. Which one is correct?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Flavio
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/9bf527a8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bbdjlknokldgbljf.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28256 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/9bf527a8/attachment-0003.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 92849 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/9bf527a8/attachment-0004.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 90850 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20210820/9bf527a8/attachment-0005.png