[DDI-SRG] [MRT] Model cleanup: string definitions

[Wendy Thomas]

As a general question...particularly in terms of string content and date is
there any concern for interoperability with Lifecycle and Codebook? There
were reasons certain fields were not allowed to use structure.



On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:40 AM Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>
wrote:

> The current approach of string types seems to be too complicated. The
> structured string types could be folded into the regular ones. Furthermore,
> there are some inconsistencies.
>
> Diagrams on the current approach and the suggested approach are attached.
> Side note: XSD data type “date” is now used instead of a special DDI data
> type for date.
>
>
>
> Please review the proposal and comment.
>
>
>
> Achim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DDI-SRG mailing list
> DDI-SRG at icpsr.umich.edu
> http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/mailman/listinfo/ddi-srg
>


-- 
Wendy L. Thomas                              Phone: +1 612.624.4389
Data Access Core Director                 Fax:   +1 612.626.8375
Minnesota Population Center             Email: wlt at umn.edu
University of Minnesota
50 Willey Hall
225 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20200203/7d556492/attachment.html