[DDI-SRG] TC: Minutes postes

Taina Jääskeläinen (TAU) taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi
Mon Mar 18 04:01:40 EDT 2019


Thanks for the responses, Wendy.
It would be helpful for users if DDI Alliance would not need a different kind of version number system from the way DDI CVG has envisioned the versioning (two-digit for source language CV, three-digit for the target languages where first two digits are the source version number). The separate versioning for languages was based on explicitly expressed user needs. For example, a language version of a  CV might be used in self-report software where depositors of data can describe their studies for the data archive.

So I wonder if the whole package versioning be managed with some kind of date + internal log combination you mentioned? Oliver?
The change log information for each language can be taken from the elements Version changes and Version notes (if any) for published CVs, and new added or withdrawn languages from publish or withdraw functions?
BTW, would it be possible for users to glean changes only in one or two language versions from the whole package, based on the language code?

But there may be user needs or technical issues involved that I cannot envision…. And cannot say how any APIs work.

The urn recorded for DDI vocabularies in the CESSDA tool in Canonical URIs and Canonical URIs of the version is naturally the DDI urn. So for citation in DDI Alliance website, Canonical URIs need no changes but URL would be to DDI Alliance website.

All the best, Taina

---
Taina Jääskeläinen
FSD Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Tampere University, FINLAND
e-mail: taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi<mailto:taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi>  | tel: +358 40 190 1444 http://www.fsd.uta.fi<http://www.fsd.uta.fi/>

From: Wendy Thomas <wlt at umn.edu>
Sent: 15. maaliskuuta 2019 16:25
To: Taina Jääskeläinen (TAU) <taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi>
Cc: Sanda Ionescu <sandai at umich.edu>; Wackerow, Joachim <Joachim.Wackerow at gesis.org>; oliver.hopt at gesis.org; DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: TC: Minutes postes

Taina,

Basically we will publish a SKOS instance that contains all languages and therefore have a single version number. How the version number is defined can be up to us. So yes we could say that the major version doesn't change unless the terms change or there is a significant correction in the intellectual content of a definition. The reference could be to the major version and the user would get the most recent sub-version of that. Some people do sub-versions simply using dates and internal change log with a date, change, and reason for change. For example: 2019-03-15, Term X definition (en) Aggregaetion changed to Aggregation, Corrected misspelling OR 2019-03-15 Added labels and definitions in German (de), added translation option. In short, it is up to us to determine the versioning rules and make them clear to users. In making a decision on this the primary issue should be user needs. What changes actually have an impact on the user and the value of stability in the version numbers.

The primary concerns of the call with TC was to make sure we had identified all the technical things that needed to be decided and completed. In particular to identify interaction points with the CESSDA tool, the production pipeline, CV/TC, and ICPSR/Web page. I will add a line to the minutes that the UNESCO link was simply and example

If I understood Oliver correctly we could get a merged language output in SKOS from the CESSDA tool. If not it is simply an additional step in the production pipeline to create a merged version from the individual language versions prior to transformation to other formats and publication. Oliver should have this in his workflow.

I will add a note in the minutes about the UNESCO link being an example of presenting multiple languages.

Regarding citation, yes, the DDI publication will provide DDI URN and URL (probably to the SKOS version as the source)...that can be decided. It should line up with the target of the resolved URN. Actually, since we have multiple formats we will need to consider just WHAT the URN is landing on. This may result in reorganization of the web content. I will note this in the minutes.

Thanks for these clarifications.
Wendy

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:13 AM Taina Jääskeläinen (TAU) <taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi<mailto:taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi>> wrote:
Hi Wendy,
Reading the minutes, a couple of clarifications, though please note that I may have misunderstood.

Versioning:

-          If I understood correctly, DDI Alliance will want to version the whole package with all language versions? If there is change in any language versions, the whole package version changes. I can see this is useful if, for example, the CV is used as a multilingual filter in a search interface.

-          The CESSDA tool versions each language separately, though the translations have a three-digit version number linked to the source as the first two digits are the source version number (i.e. 2.0.2 means the second TL version of the source version 2.0). This is useful for users who are using the CV in their metadata. They are only  interested in when and what has been changed in their language version to see what needs to be changed in their legacy metadata and in their systems where the CV is implemented.

-          The issue maybe to discuss is how to produce the whole package versioning, in the merged SKOS of the CESSDA tool, or in the DDI publication pipeline? But this is technical, so out of my expertise.

The link to the Unesco vocabularies was just an example of the one typical html display of multilingual vocabularies. Based on open source publication platform skosmos. It displays the whole language version on the left and term-specific display on the right. In term-specific display all language versions of a specific term are displayed. What is lacking, I think, is the possibility to click on any language term on the right and change language that way.

Regarding the citation, the citation in the CESSDA tool has both URN and URL. Did we conclude that in CESSDA tool the citation URL is to that tool, and in DDI Alliance website the URL in citation is to the DDI Alliance webpage? That would need to be taken into account in the DDI publication pipeline.

All the best, Taina

---
Taina Jääskeläinen
FSD Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Tampere University, FINLAND
e-mail: taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi<mailto:taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi>  | tel: +358 40 190 1444 http://www.fsd.uta.fi<http://www.fsd.uta.fi/>

From: Wendy Thomas <wlt at umn.edu<mailto:wlt at umn.edu>>
Sent: 14. maaliskuuta 2019 18:55
To: Taina Jääskeläinen (TAU) <taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi<mailto:taina.jaaskelainen at tuni.fi>>; Sanda Ionescu <sandai at umich.edu<mailto:sandai at umich.edu>>
Subject: Fwd: TC: Minutes postes


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Wendy Thomas <wlt at umn.edu<mailto:wlt at umn.edu>>
Date: Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:39 AM
Subject: TC: Minutes postes
To: DDI Structural Reform Working Group. <ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu<mailto:ddi-srg at icpsr.umich.edu>>

Today's meeting focused on CVs and the new production pipelines for publication. Taina and Sanda joined the meeting. Minutes are at
https://ddi-alliance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DDI4/pages/491551/TC+Meeting+Minutes

Action items coming out of this meeting:

  1.  TC needs to survey DDI users and determine who is using Genericode structures currently and whether this structure should be persisted given other options that will be made available for CVs
  2.  CVG needs to provide summary of desired functionality for the CV web pages so that priorities can be determined for changes
  3.  TC and CVG need to write up new production process from creation of content using CESSDA tool and export of SKOS file, through production and review, to publication and announcement. This must be completed for presentation at the Scientific Board meeting.
Many thanks to Taina and Sanda for joining the TC meeting!

--
Wendy L. Thomas                              Phone: +1 612.624.4389
Data Access Core Director                 Fax:   +1 612.626.8375
Minnesota Population Center             Email: wlt at umn.edu<mailto:wlt at umn.edu>
University of Minnesota
50 Willey Hall
225 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455


--
Wendy L. Thomas                              Phone: +1 612.624.4389
Data Access Core Director                 Fax:   +1 612.626.8375
Minnesota Population Center             Email: wlt at umn.edu<mailto:wlt at umn.edu>
University of Minnesota
50 Willey Hall
225 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455


--
Wendy L. Thomas                              Phone: +1 612.624.4389
Data Access Core Director                 Fax:   +1 612.626.8375
Minnesota Population Center             Email: wlt at umn.edu<mailto:wlt at umn.edu>
University of Minnesota
50 Willey Hall
225 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.icpsr.umich.edu/pipermail/ddi-srg/attachments/20190318/3c1cdc16/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the DDI-SRG mailing list